Back in the U.S., the Supreme Court on Thursday approved a South Carolina congressional map that a lower court previously ruled was racially gerrymandered and constituted a “bleaching of African ...
The Supreme Court allowed South Carolina to use a disputed voting map. The U.N.’s top court ruled that Israel must halt its military offensive in Rafah. The U.S. government filed a lawsuit to ...
With state election deadlines approaching, a federal court in March had already ruled that South Carolina could use the contested map in this year’s election. The decision was 6-3 along ...
The case concerned a constitutional puzzle: how to distinguish the roles of race and partisanship in drawing voting ... Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ...
From The New York Times: The Supreme Court cleared the way on Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... one against the expansion of voting rights and one ...
(Jeffrey Collins/AP) The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed South Carolina to use a congressional map that a lower court had said weakened Black voting rights, bolstering the political fortunes of ...
By a vote of 6-to-3, along ideological lines, the court upheld a redistricting map drawn by the South Carolina legislature ... and their voting patterns strongly correlate with race.
(CNN) — The Supreme Court upheld a pro-Republican South Carolina congressional ... to redraw its congressional map after groups argued it violated the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Alito said the civil rights groups failed to produce any direct evidence finding that District 1 was drawn with a racial target and that the trial court’s findings show a connection between lawmakers’ ...
The Supreme Court upheld a pro-Republican South Carolina congressional map Thursday ... such as to comply with statutes ensuring equal voting rights,” Kagan wrote. “Go ahead, though you ...