The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday to reverse a lower court's decision that said a South Carolina redistricting map was unconstitutional, rejecting the idea that it was racially discriminatory.
South Carolina state Sen. Nikki Setzler (D) looks at a map of suggested U.S. House districts drawn with 2020 census data in 2022. (Jeffrey Collins/AP) The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed South ...
Also, the U.S. called for the breakup of Ticketmaster’s owner. Here’s the latest at the end of Thursday. By Matthew Cullen The Supreme Court’s conservative majority cleared the way today for ...
The conservative majority ruled the GOP-drawn map was not racial gerrymandering. The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a Republican-drawn South Carolina congressional district, reversing lower ...
The Supreme Court upheld a pro-Republican South Carolina congressional map Thursday, rejecting the argument raised by civil rights groups that lawmakers impermissibly used race as a proxy to ...
The case concerned a constitutional puzzle: how to distinguish the roles of race and partisanship in drawing voting maps when Black voters overwhelmingly favor Democrats. By Adam Liptak Reporting ...
WASHINGTON, May 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court made it harder on Thursday to prove racial discrimination in electoral maps in a major ruling backing South Carolina Republicans who moved out ...
Ah, South Carolina—too small for a republic, too large for an insane asylum, but jussssst right for the current carefully manufactured conservative majority on the Supreme Court. From The New ...
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday made it far more difficult to challenge state redistricting plans as unconstitutional racial gerrymanders. By a vote of 6-to-3, along ideological lines, the ...